The Art of Resistance, 2

For months, I’ve seen reactions to the idea that we would study this book for an entire year: people who have hated–or at least ignored–Revelation their entire lives since it “had nothing to do with them.” On the other end of the spectrum, you have people who get a little too excited: “Yeah! I love talking about Revelation! End times, baby!”

Woah. Throttle back there, bud.

So if you’re in the former group, don’t worry, you’re in good hands. Venerated theologians like Augustine and Luther ignored or actively disliked Revelation. If you’re in the latter group, that’s okay too, as there have been great, God-loving scholars who have dedicated their lives to this particular work–I think there is a way to be healthily enthralled with it. But I think we can find a middle path here: a way for us to view this book as something which was incredibly current for its original audience, and yet continues to speak to us today.

There are many potential ways into this third path, but I think if we could begin to see Revelation as a piece of artistically-minded literature that is centered on inspiring resistance in its original readers, we could grow in our understanding and application of this work itself, and our concept of Scripture and the Gospel as a whole. If we could begin to allow this book to shift some of our old ways of thinking, to comfort us in our affliction and challenge us in our comfort, we could begin to receive what I see the author trying to give to his fellow believers. To discover this approach though, we must first begin to ask ourselves what this thing is. What is this book?

As a part of the biblical library, Revelation is unique: it is neither an historical document or written law, such as we find in the Old Testament, nor is it poetry or wisdom literature (though it certainly contains both). It’s not a gospel narrative (though it does contain another angle on the character of Jesus), nor an epistle in the sense of those written by Paul, Peter, John, etc.

So what is this book?

First, I think we need to understand what we mean by the title, which comes from the Greek word ἀποκάλυψις [apokalupsis], which primarily means “to unveil” or “lay bare” that which has been hidden, or, as we have later translated it, to reveal–to see what before you had been unable to see. This is what the writer of the books sees himself as doing, since he says it in the first line of the work: “The revelation of Jesus Christ which God gave….” So one of the main things you can expect from this work if you properly attend to what it’s trying to do is perceive things which you had missed the first time around. This book, as we’ll see in a minute, is going to take nearly all of the major biblical themes and turn them on their head, flipping them upside down that you see them again in a new light, thereby unveiling as if for the first time the main thrust of the Gospel.

Some of those things that Revelation will turn upside down for us are:

Scenes of terror, which will be, if we allow them, revealed (apokalupto’ed) as scenes of encouragement and peace, calls for courageous perseverance rather than cowering fear.

Heaven is not someplace far off that God’s very few chosen people go away to in the here-after, but will be revealed as a place that comes down to earth, with gates open to all the peoples of the world, who bring their wealth into it in the here-and-now.

maxresdefault
It’s not that everything I say is brilliant. It’s that most of it is and the rest is said in a British accent.

(The Anglican scholar NT Wright is fond of saying that “Heaven is important, but it’s not the end of the world.”) Heaven, which we have for so long understood as a place, will be revealed as a people at union with God, as almost indistinguishable from Him.

This is because we discover in Revelation that the Kingdom of God is revealed as being fundamentally inclusive rather than exclusive. Many scenes of apparent exclusivity with which Revelation is rife are, if seen from a particular vantage, incredibly inclusive because they deal with some of the other major themes of the Bible, such as:

Judgment, which is revealed again and again in Scripture as intended for restoration, rather than punishment. The justice and judgment of God is not oriented toward separation or retribution, but for healing and restoration, for re-inclusion into the community.

I recognize this can be a challenging concept as we have for so long understood God’s judgment to be the separation of the bad from the good, the wheat from the chaff, the sheep from the goats, who’s in and who’s out. But I believe the reality of the Gospel, particularly as informed through the lens of the prophets, shows a God who presents His people with a choice, and then pursues them if they choose the one that damages themselves or others. Yes, the purifying and purging fire of God’s pursuit can be painful, but it is intended to leave the dross behind rather than burn the whole thing up.

Ultimately, this is all because in Revelation we discover an overarching theme that resounds over and over, bell-like throughout all the infamously confusing and psychadelic scenes depicted in this book: Victory. But here we find this idea turned upside down as well.

Here we discover that to “overcome” or be victorious is unveiled as sacrificial death on behalf of our enemies. It is not God’s people slaying their enemies, bathing triumphantly in their blood, but the people of Christ laying down our lives for them as he did, asking for their forgiveness even as they themselves strike the killing blow.

This victory that Christ brings is a different sort of victory. It’s a different sort of peace. A different sort of heaven. It’s whole new way to see the Gospel, the Good News, as Christ’s rather than Caesar’s–an entirely different sort of “Lord,” “Son of God,” and “bringer of peace.” A new name under heaven which saves you. This is different than what the Romans (and every other kingdom before and since) were offering the world. This is the Kingdom of the Lamb who was slain, whose victory and Life are discovered in sacrificial death.

Advertisements

2 Comments

  1. Although I like the notion you have about the idea of Judgment,

    “Judgment, which is revealed again and again in Scripture as intended for restoration, rather than punishment. The justice and judgment of God is not oriented toward separation or retribution, but for healing and restoration, for re-inclusion into the community.”

    I would contend that the quoted is rooted in the Old Testament idea of Judgment rather than that of the New Testament approach. Throughout the Old Testament God is working with his people and in his Judgment he is actively anticipating his people turning back to him. In the New Testament it seems that the judgement of God in Jesus is finalized, meaning basically that those that do not align themselves with the purposes of Jesus will incur the punishment of that decision ultimately. Particularly in John’s Gospel we find this idea of Judgment, that it is a divisive (John 5:19-30; 9:35-41), that those who are not for Jesus are agains him and the Father, and therefore outside of the Kingdom of God.

    Now I would also say that the word used in the NT is quite legalistic in nature, lending to the decisive tone of its context. You either receive a Judgment of restoration and reconciliation with God and his people, or you receive a Judgment of punishment, which dictates your exclusion from God and his people.

    I do agree that he heart of God is that all would chose his way and therefore be reconciled but his judgement is based on the choice, with or…against.

    Like

    1. I hear what you’re saying, but I think what Jesus especially is doing in the NT is continuing and expanding the OT conception of God. He was *first* a Jewish reformer before He was worshiped, so I think we ought to understand his words in light of rather than in spite of the OT context.
      With regard to judgment in Revelation, the point I will be making over the course of the study is that John puts scenes of ultimate reconciliation and ultimate judgment side by side. He is content with the tension of not knowing. The point is the choice itself (which is always-already offered to *me*), rather than speculations on who/how many choose one path over another.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s